Best Practices for namespace in Kubernetes

Namespaces in Kubernetes are a powerful concept that can help enable advanced use cases related to logical isolation, organization, and resource utilization. This guide will explore practical recommendations and best practices for leveraging namespaces in Kubernetes. Designed for engineers familiar with Kubernetes, this article offers actionable insights and practical tips to optimize Kubernetes resource management and enhance security. 

This article will cover Kubernetes namespace use cases, pitfalls to avoid, and six best practices you can immediately apply to your projects.  Notably, we’ll cover how namespaces relate to multi-tenancy. 

We will also highlight examples of namespaced resource types, such as pods and services, versus those that are cluster-wide, like nodes and PersistentVolumes. 

By the end of this article, you'll have a comprehensive understanding of Kubernetes namespace best practices and why they do not inherently offer complete isolation.

‍

Summary of key namespace in Kubernetes best practices

The table below summarizes the key Kubernetes namespace best practices this article will explore in more detail.

What is a namespace in Kubernetes?

Kubernetes namespaces provide a fundamental mechanism for logically dividing and isolating resources within a Kubernetes cluster. 

While this article caters to advanced users, it's essential to remember that namespaces serve multiple purposes, including:

• Isolating applications and workloads
• Providing resource management boundaries
• Organizing resources for different teams or projects. 

With namespaces, administrators can ensure better resource utilization, enhance security, and simplify cluster management. 

Namespace in Kubernetes: Six essential best practices

Kubernetes namespaces offer many benefits, but using them effectively requires context and understanding of what they can — and can’t — do. The six best practices below can help administrators get the most out of Kubernetes namespaces and understand when to supplement namespaces with other solutions. For each best practice, we’ll highlight key points, example implementations, or other important concepts that can help you leverage them in real-world scenarios. 

Implement consistent naming conventions

Consistency is a fundamental principle in software development, and Kubernetes namespaces are no exception. Establishing a clear and consistent naming convention for your namespaces is crucial for maintaining order, avoiding confusion, and improving overall organization within your Kubernetes cluster.

Key points

• Clarity and understanding: Consistent naming conventions provide clear insights into the purpose and ownership of each namespace. Engineers can quickly identify the purpose of a namespace just by looking at its name, streamlining collaboration and minimizing ambiguity.
• Standardization: A unified naming convention promotes standardization across your projects and environments, making it easier for teams to align and adopt best practices consistently.
• Automation and tooling: Automated deployment processes, scripts, and tools can leverage consistent namespace names to enhance efficiency and minimize manual errors.

Example Kubernetes namespace naming conventions definitions

Let's consider a scenario where multiple development teams work on different projects within the same Kubernetes cluster.  We can establish a consistent naming convention using a combination of the project name, environment, and team name. For example:

• <code>&lt;project>-&lt;environment>-&lt;team></code>
• my-app-production-teamA
• my-app-staging-teamB
• my-app-development-teamC

Here are a few different patterns for namespaces naming conventions:

Project-based naming:

• <code>&lt;project>-&lt;environment></code>
• Example: my-app-production, my-app-staging, my-app-development

Team-based naming:

• <code>&lt;team>-&lt;environment></code>
• Example: teamA-production, teamB-staging, teamC-development

Service-based naming:

• <code>&lt;service>-&lt;environment></code>
• Example: frontend-app-production, backend-service-staging, api-service-development

Domain-based naming:

• <code>&lt;domain>-&lt;environment></code>
• Example: marketing-website-production, erp-system-staging, crm-platform-development

Combination of project and team:

• <code>&lt;project>-&lt;team>-&lt;environment></code>
• Example: my-app-teamA-production, my-app-teamB-staging, my-app-teamC-development

{{banner-1="/utility-pages/banners"}}

Use resource labeling and categorization

In a Kubernetes environment, resource labeling is a powerful practice that allows you to logically group, categorize, and identify your resources within namespaces. By applying meaningful labels to Pods, Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, and other Kubernetes objects, you gain valuable insights into each resource's purpose, functionality, and ownership.

Key points

• Resource identification: Labels act as metadata, enabling you to quickly identify and distinguish resources based on specific attributes or characteristics.
• Efficient resource management: With labeled resources, you can efficiently search, filter, and select subsets of resources, simplifying tasks like monitoring, scaling, and troubleshooting.
• Grouping and organization: Labels facilitate the grouping of related resources, which is especially useful for microservices architectures or multi-team projects.

Example implementation

Let's consider a scenario where a team manages a microservices-based application in Kubernetes with several services and deployments across different namespaces. They could apply labels based on key attributes such as app, env, and tier to leverage resource labeling effectively.

Deployment

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  namespace: my-app-namespace
  name: my-app-deployment
  labels:
    app: my-app
    env: production
    tier: backend
spec:
  # Deployment spec details...

Service

apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  namespace: my-app-namespace
  name: my-app-service
  labels:
    app: my-app
    env: production
    tier: backend
spec:
  # Service spec details...

By labeling resources like Deployments and Services, the team gains the ability to group and identify them based on the attributes defined. For instance, they can easily query for all resources in the production environment or those labeled as backend, making resource management and operational tasks much more efficient.

Enforce role-based access control (RBAC) policies

In Kubernetes, RBAC is a powerful mechanism for granting permissions and controlling access to resources within namespaces. By defining RBAC policies at the namespace level, you can ensure that different personas within your organization have appropriate access rights to perform their duties while maintaining security and resource ownership.

Key points

• Granular access control: RBAC allows you to define fine-grained roles, specifying precisely what actions users or groups can perform on specific resources within a namespace.
• Resource isolation: By implementing RBAC at the namespace level, you can enforce strict resource isolation, ensuring that users only interact with the resources they are explicitly allowed to access.
• Principle of least privilege: RBAC follows the "least privilege" principle, ensuring that users have the minimum necessary permissions to perform their tasks, reducing the risk of unauthorized actions.

RBAC within Kubernetes namespaces

Let's consider a scenario where a Kubernetes cluster hosts multiple applications, each managed by different teams. To ensure proper access control within namespaces, the team implements RBAC policies that grant varying permissions based on roles.

Create a custom role

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  namespace: my-app-namespace
  name: developer-role
rules:
  - apiGroups: [""]  # Empty API group refers to core Kubernetes API
    resources: ["pods", "services", "deployments"]
    verbs: ["get", "list", "create", "update", "delete"]

Role binding

apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: developer-rolebinding
  namespace: my-app-namespace
subjects:
  - kind: User
    name: developer1@example.com
roleRef:
  kind: Role
  name: developer-role
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io

In this example, a custom Role named developer-role is created, granting permissions to perform actions like get, list, create, update, and delete on resources such as Pods, Services, and Deployments within the namespace my-app-namespace. The Role is then bound to a specific user (developer1@example.com) within the namespace through the RoleBinding, giving that user the necessary permissions to work with the resources managed by their team.

Cluster-wide (non-namespaced) RBAC

While RBAC policies effectively manage access within namespaces, Kubernetes provides a broader access control mechanism through ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding. 

ClusterRoles define permissions that apply across the entire cluster, allowing actions like managing nodes, namespaces, or custom resources. ClusterRoleBindings, on the other hand, bind ClusterRoles to specific subjects, such as users or groups, granting them global permissions. 

By utilizing ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding, administrators can establish global access control for certain privileged tasks, such as cluster-wide monitoring or managing custom resources. 

However, it is essential to exercise caution when granting such wide-reaching permissions, as they can significantly impact the overall cluster security. Implementing ClusterRole and ClusterRoleBinding in conjunction with namespace-level RBAC Policies ensures a comprehensive and balanced approach to access control, empowering administrators to finely tune the privileges granted to users and groups across the entire Kubernetes cluster.

Regularly review and cleanup Kubernetes namespaces 

As your Kubernetes cluster evolves, so does the usage and lifecycle of various namespaces. To ensure efficient resource utilization and maintain a clutter-free environment, conducting regular reviews and cleanup of namespaces is essential. Identifying and removing unused or obsolete namespaces optimizes resource allocation, improves cluster performance, and reduces management overhead.

Key points

• Resource optimization: Regular namespace reviews help identify resources no longer in use, allowing you to release allocated resources and optimize the cluster for active workloads.
• Stale environments: Old or forgotten namespaces might contain stale environments that can interfere with active deployments. Removing such environments minimizes the risk of unintended conflicts.
• Resource reclamation: Deleting unused namespaces allows resources like storage volumes, IP addresses, and network resources to be reclaimed for other purposes.

Example implementation

Let's consider a scenario where a development team manages multiple namespaces for various projects and experiments.  The team establishes a schedule for regular namespace audits to ensure that namespaces are periodically reviewed and cleaned up.

Namespace audit process

At a high level, a Kubernetes namespace audit process should consist of these four steps. 

1. Review frequency: The team decides to conduct a namespace review once a month to account for the dynamic nature of their projects.
2. Identify stale namespaces: Using tools like kubectl, they list all namespaces and examine their contents to identify those inactive for an extended period or no longer in use.
3. Notify owners: For inactive or obsolete namespaces, the team notifies the owners or relevant stakeholders to confirm if they can be safely deleted.
4. ‍Safe deletion: Once confirmation is received or after a grace period, the team safely deletes unused namespaces using. If the namespace contains some resources, they will also be cleaned up. Object Finalizers is a mechanism which can be used for advanced deletion lifecycle behavior, so be aware of it and use it to your advantage.

kubectl delete namespace  <namespace-name>

By adhering to this process, the team ensures that their Kubernetes cluster remains organized, with resources dedicated to active projects. The regular cleanup process helps prevent resource wastage, optimize cluster performance, and maintain an efficient and clutter-free Kubernetes environment.

Apply namespace quotas and resource limits

In a shared Kubernetes cluster, it's crucial to ensure fair resource allocation and prevent any single namespace from consuming excessive resources. Implementing namespace quotas and resource limits lets you control resource usage and enforce appropriate boundaries for individual namespaces.

Key points

• Resource guarantees: Setting resource quotas allows you to guarantee the maximum amount of CPU, memory, and other resources a namespace can consume, preventing resource hogs from affecting other applications.
• Resource limits: Implementing resource limits ensures that workloads within a namespace cannot exceed a specified amount of resources, promoting a more stable and predictable environment.
• Resource allocation planning: With quotas and limits in place, teams can plan their resource allocation more effectively, ensuring that each namespace receives the necessary resources while avoiding oversubscription.

Example implementation

Let's consider a scenario where a Kubernetes cluster hosts multiple applications for different teams. The cluster administrators set up namespace-level configurations to enforce quotas and resource limits.

Namespace quota

apiVersion: v1
kind: ResourceQuota
metadata:
  name: my-app-quota
  namespace: my-app-namespace
spec:
  hard:
    pods: "10"
    requests.cpu: "4"
    requests.memory: 4Gi
    limits.cpu: "8"
    limits.memory: 8Gi

In this example, the administrators define a namespace-level ResourceQuota for the my-app-namespace. The quota specifies that the namespace can have a maximum of 10 Pods and is allowed to request up to 4 CPU cores and 4Gi of memory. Additionally, the namespace is limited to a maximum of 8 CPU cores and 8Gi of memory. Once these limits are reached, any additional resource requests within the namespace will be rejected.

By applying namespace quotas and resource limits, the cluster administrators ensure that each team's workloads receive fair resource allocation, preventing resource contention and promoting a stable and well-managed Kubernetes environment.

Understand common misconceptions and limitations of  Kubernetes namespaces

The core theme that emerges when working with namespaces in Kubernetes is that they only offer a logical separation within the cluster. namespaces do not inherently provide complete isolation. It’s essential to recognize their limitations in achieving true isolation. To achieve true cluster isolation, proper multi-tenancy strategies are required.

Potential hazards of cross-namespace networking

A significant concern arises from unrestricted cross-namespace networking, where communication between resources in different namespaces can lead to potential security risks and unintended dependencies. 

For example, consider a scenario where a development team allows unrestricted database access between namespaces, and an unauthorized service gains access to sensitive data, resulting in a security breach. 

To mitigate these hazards, it is crucial to adopt network policies that explicitly control communication between namespaces. By setting strict ingress and egress rules combined with network policies, you can reinforce security and minimize the risk of data leakage or unauthorized access.

Shared cluster-wide resources

While namespaces provide a level of resource isolation, it's important to note that they still share cluster-wide resources. For instance, storage volumes, IP addresses, and networking resources are shared across all namespaces. 

This means resource-intensive workloads or misconfigurations within one namespace can affect overall cluster performance and potentially impact other namespaces. Examples of potential impacts include:

• Resource Starvation: Over-allocating resources, such as CPU or memory, within a namespace, can lead to resource starvation for other namespaces, causing performance degradation cluster-wide.
• Unbounded Logs: Excessive logging from a single namespace can consume disk space and IO resources, impacting the overall cluster's ability to handle logs efficiently.
• Network Bandwidth: Large-scale data transfers or network-intensive operations within a namespace can saturate the network, leading to communication delays for other namespaces.
• Misconfigured Network Policies: Incorrectly defined network policies can inadvertently allow unauthorized communication between namespaces, compromising security and resource isolation.
• Excessive Retry Attempts: Misconfigured applications with high retry rates can generate unnecessary load on backend services, affecting the overall stability and responsiveness of the cluster.

To overcome these limitations, consider leveraging effective multi-tenancy strategies, such as virtual Kubernetes clusters for specific tenants or teams, which enables you to create isolated virtual clusters within the shared Kubernetes infrastructure. By using virtual clusters, you can allocate dedicated resource quotas to different teams or projects, ensuring that critical applications receive the necessary resources without competing with other workloads. 

Additionally, utilize Kubernetes Network Policies and Resource Quotas effectively to create strong boundaries between namespaces, further enhancing the security and isolation required for mission-critical applications. 

Uffizzi leverages Kubernetes virtual clusters to help users create and remove ephemeral application stacks in minutes, removing the complexity and time-consuming labor involved in gaining this higher level of security, developer experience, and performance.  

Kubernetes virtual clusters provide a dynamic and isolated environment within a shared Kubernetes cluster - they are fast to spin up (around 60s or less on Uffizzi), resource efficient, and provide complete cluster access to the end user. This approach empowers teams to create distinct and secure ephemeral environments for development, quality assurance, staging and demos while efficiently utilizing shared cluster resources, ultimately enhancing collaboration and accelerating development velocity. 

{{banner-2="/utility-pages/banners"}}

Conclusion

While namespaces serve as a logical boundary for organizing workloads, it is important to highlight that namespaces do not inherently provide complete isolation. 

You must establish and maintain robust network policies and access controls to prevent unauthorized access, data leakage, and unintended dependencies. This article and the others in this guide will show you how to implement multi-tenancy strategies for achieving proper isolation in Kubernetes.

You'll discover how to unlock the efficiency of Kubernetes at scale by leveraging Environments as a Service solutions for multi-tenant clusters. These solutions empower you to establish stringent security boundaries and ensure isolation within your cluster while driving efficiencies at scale with Ephemeral Environments.

‍